WAOK-AM Uses Method of Moments Proof
The antenna system employs Kintronic Labs VSU-1 voltage sampling units.
The characteristic impedance of the sample lines was also measured using the following mathematical expression:
Zo = √( √(R1² + X1²) x √ (R2² + X2²))
With R1 + X1 equal to the measured impedance at the +45 degree offset frequency and R2 + X2 equal to the measured impedance at the -45 degree offset frequency.
The results of the sample line characteristic impedance measurements are shown in Table 2.
|Tower||+45 Degree Offset Frequency (kHz)||+45 Degree Measured Impedance (ohms)||-45 Degree Offset Frequency (kHz)||-45 Degree Measured Impedance (ohms)||Calculated Characteristic Impedance (ohms)|
|1||1118.889||7.54 - j48.15||1367.531||9.18 + j48.11||48.86|
|2||1120.2696||7.51 - j47.81||1369.2184||9.01 + j47.65||48.44|
|3||1120.0725||7.45 - j47.53||1368.9775||9.00 + j47.47||48.21|
|4||1119.5559||7.49 - j47.91||1368.3641||9.10 + j47.92||48.66|
|Table 2. Sample line characteristic impedances|
In addition Crain conducted measurements of the sample line electrical lengths that were derived by measuring the open circuited 90 degree and 450 degree resonance frequencies. The results are shown in Table 3.
|Tower||Sampling Line Open-Circuited 90 Degree Resonance (kHz)||Sampling Line Open-Circuited 450 Degree Resonance (kHz)||Sampling Line Calculated Electrical Length 1380kHz (degrees)||Measured Impedance with VSU Connected 1380kHz (ohms)|
|1||246.105||1243.21||499.513||5.48 - j33.08|
|2||246.400||1244.744||498.898||5.42 - j33.13|
|3||246.725||1244.525||498.986||5.41 - j33.14|
|4||246.312||1243.951||499.216||5.44 - j31.91|
|Table 3. Resonance and measured impedances|
The measured characteristic impedance and electrical length variations relative to the average are less than ±1 percent and ±0.5 degrees. Based on these measured data, Crain returned to his office to develop a computer model for this complex array using MININEC Broadcast Professional V14.5 software. Each of the four towers were modeled using 19 segments with the tower 1 and 2 segments having a uniform length and radius and towers 3 and 4 being modeled in a graduated diameter stacked cylinder approach where the bottom segments had longer segments and larger radii with uniform segment and radius at the top fixed cross section portion of the tower. The tower spacings and orientations from the FCC database were identical in the self-impedance and DA models. The segment lengths and radii were varied while maintaining the tower height as constant to converge on modeled tower impedances with the other towers shorted that matched the corresponding measured impedances. A table of the final modeled segments for towers 3 and 4 are shown in Table 4.
|Tower Segment||Physical Height (degrees)||Model Height (degrees)||Model Percent of Height||Model Radius (meters)||Percent Equivalent Radius|
|3-13 to 3-19||4.6979||5.0737||107.999||0.3274||100|
|Table 4. Modeled segments for towers 3 and 4|
- continued on page 4
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Today in Radio History
The history of radio broadcasting extends beyond the work of a few famous inventors.
Read each issue online in our Digital Edition Format in your Web browser.
EAS Information More on EAS
The feed provides feeds for all US states and territories.
Need a calendar for your computer desktop? Use one of ours.
Information from manufacturers and associations about industry news, products, technology and business announcements.
This high-visibility and high-traffic area got the full acoustic treatment.
Browse Back Issues[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Also in the May Issue
- Remote Access and Site Connectivity: Wireless
- Standards of FM Allocation and Interference
- Side by Side: Mic Processors
- Field Report: Deva Broadcast DB4004
- Field Report: APT WorldCast Systems Horizon NextGen
- New Products
- 20 Years of Radio magazine: May 1994